Retail Dude

Hello Readers,

Its been an awfully long time since any post in the blog and due apologies for it. This post is more of a thought, that i was having for a long time now and thus wanted to share with all of you.

India has now proven what a strong economy is all about. Although it has been the last fortress to conquer to all brands across the globe, they still flock to this amazing demography. The varied profiles of the Indian masses have made it even more challenging for hitting the right positioning bucket. Brands are made and brands are eroded in this country. But when i come down to the basic idea of branding and its stages, the last being its ambassador, i wonder does it still work that way?

A simple exercise: Think of a 2 brands (Products, Goods etc) which have in the last 10 years been built routinely built upon from scratch?

In most probability you will come up by sayin “Ipod” (but wasnt it Apple Incs branding that it shouldered), or say Viao (but isnt it a Sony First?). The point i am tryin to make is that do not count brands which are the children of some huge names. Are you left with any? Yes you might get a few in the service  category! (Websites, Restaurants et all)

The most popularly talked about brands and leading examples in classrooms are all brands which are pre millenium. Does it mean, that it is getting increasingly difficult if not impossible to follow the brand building exercise? Or are they very short lived? What about brand icons, associations that we have read about? Do they dont apply anymore.

If i may talk of the Indian Consumer, is it becoming difficult to get that brand loyalty or followers from them? or Is it that the basket of offerings have increased and hence the result?

These questions are more or less inter related and have plagued me for quite some time now. I wanted to know the various points people make to encourage a discussion. The most logical thing that came to my mind was that the consumer today is more aware and therefore has comparisons and benchmarks of their own. They know what quallity and service means to them in their own yard sticks. I do not see any company fulfilling them all at any point to all the segments. Therefore a universally appealing brand is missing. We have more switchers than ever in any context. What people think is branded (having a name tag) is what is craved for. It could be the technology, the product offing or even the latest “in thing” that enthuses its customers. Its not about the association you build these days. That stong presence of a community is certainly missing. Its something that you want to “own” , which in branding terminology is something in you, that wants to be a part of the brand. Aspirations being build onto a personality to create ambassadors of it. Branding expertise is very low in India where manufacturers still think that branding means advertising. Ideally the brand response has been low to the consumer expectations is what comes to me.

This wasnt the case in the past, where the most strongest of brands today in the market have been created with a certain degree of pedigree in their own fields. How was the associations made, which is remote in todays context? I also beleive that the brands in history are the ones where the product arose of a need, which ideally gave them the exclusivity of addressing a need. Most brands today compete with each other of pushing products to people. Lifestyle concepts have risen only in the last decade, which might be another contributing factor of very less brands making its presence felt.Companies that build for the long-term and establish brand equity, rather than brand image, should outride any ups and downs of markets and of customers.

Will it then help build a brand in its true sense?

Cheers

Sudip

 Email

 Print